Closures, Objects, and Poor Men

The venerable master Qc Na was walking with his student, Anton. Hoping to prompt the master into a discussion, Anton said "Master, I have heard that objects are a very good thing - is this true?" Qc Na looked pityingly at his student and replied, "Foolish pupil - objects are merely a poor man's closures."

Chastised, Anton took his leave from his master and returned to his cell, intent on studying closures. He carefully read the entire "Lambda: The Ultimate..." series of papers and its cousins, and implemented a small Scheme interpreter with a closure-based object system. He learned much, and looked forward to informing his master of his progress.

On his next walk with Qc Na, Anton attempted to impress his master by saying "Master, I have diligently studied the matter, and now understand that objects are truly a poor man's closures." Qc Na responded by hitting Anton with his stick, saying "When will you learn? Closures are a poor man's object." At that moment, Anton became enlightened.

Thanks to Anton van Straaten.

Posted on June 4, 2003 01:44 PM
More languages articles

Comments

I think I have just been enlightened.

Posted by: Pupeno at February 5, 2006 02:26 PM

Aha, me enlightened either.

Posted by: josson smith at February 21, 2006 10:21 PM

"An object" != "poor man's closure"

An object is an element that represent itself.

An prototype is an advanced object and classless.

Posted by: J.C. at February 12, 2007 11:03 PM

E.g. how do i represent the object anMouse as a closure?

Answer: %$/%)![$(]

Posted by: at February 12, 2007 11:26 PM

brilliant

Posted by: Sean at January 11, 2008 02:21 PM
Post a comment









Remember info?




Prove you're human. Type "human":